BC Parks Foundation raised $3 million via crowd-funding to protect 2,000 acres in British Columbia. (Photo: BC Parks Foundation)

Is crowd-funding a viable strategy for raising funds to protect land? Canadians seem to make the case that it can be. 

The BC Parks Foundation just completed a $3 million dollar crowd-fundraising campaign to protect 2,000 acres with three miles of waterfront along Princess Louisa Inlet in British Columbia. The funds were raised over the course of several months. 

Andrew Day, BC Parks Foundation CEO, said some of the funds came in through donations of $100,000 or more, but there were large numbers of smaller donations from individuals. One fifth grade elementary school class raised $1,100. Donations also came in from citizens in other countries, including Germany and Japan. The BC Parks Foundation effort is thought to be the biggest crowd-funding effort for land protection in Canada. 

Crowd-funding for conservation is getting attention. A recent study looked at 577 crowd funded conservation projects carried out on various platforms since 2009. Most of these involved smaller scale research efforts for species conservation, rather than outright land 

protection. The overall funding raised across all campaigns was not high, but the study notes other awareness raising benefits from the campaigns — a diagram of tweet distribution for one small campaign related to research on kangaroos is a good illustration. 

The Pennsylvania Land Trust Association (PALTA) provides helpful information on crowd funding for land conservation, as well as some examples of campaigns conducted over the last few years.

There’s clear evidence from the crowd-funding study that campaigns can draw funders from beyond the boundaries of the area where a specific conservation project is carried out. The Canadian example confirms that. It seems that a sense of urgency, a resource that resonates with a broad segment of the public, and compelling outreach are necessary for a major campaign. The British Columbia project had all of that. It’s worth thinking about where and when those factors might come together in a Chesapeake watershed land conservation project.

Lightning Update is a regular communication of the Chesapeake Conservation Partnership. Any opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions of the Partnership or member organizations.
To share a success story, news, or important event, send your information to:

[email protected]

Support for the Chesapeake Conservation Partnership is provided by:
National Park Service Chesapeake
EPA Chesapeake Bay Program
USDA Forest Service
Pennsylvania Department of Conservation & Natural Resources
Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Virginia Outdoors Foundation
US Fish & Wildlife Service
Chesapeake Conservancy

The Chesapeake Conservation Partnership is co-convened by: